Software Architecture AI

After the honest look, not before. Sometimes a repair is the right path. Sometimes a lean clean rebuild is more honest and cheaper in the long run. Anyone who tells you which one it is before seeing your code is guessing. You get the real call once I have looked.

It means you get the senior technical judgment a non-technical founder is usually missing, without hiring a full-time CTO. Will the architecture hold, is it secure, does it scale, repair or rebuild. AI writes the code, but someone has to own those decisions. That is the part I take.

No. If you know your business and can point at where it hurts, that is enough. The AI tools are good enough now that the biggest leverage is in the right judgment, not in you learning to code. My job is to build the technical bridge so you can stay with your business.

It starts with a 60-minute reality-check for 99 EUR. Not a sales pitch: you walk me through what you built and where it wobbles, I give you an honest read on repair-or-rebuild and what it would take. If the hour gives you nothing, you get your money back, no questions. Project pricing depends on scope and we set it clearly up front.

Both. I meet you where you stand: a running prototype, a spec, or an idea worth sharpening. Beyond the build I also do custom software where no off-the-shelf tool fits, AI coaching to use existing tools well, and brand-voice AI systems that keep your email, service and social sounding like you. Built for solopreneurs, small teams and SMBs up to ~20 people, not enterprise.